Friday 28 February 2014

The role of Family in Human Development

The role of Family in Human Development
By Sr. Sheela Joseph SSpS








Family is a unit typically consisting of father, mother and children. The family is profoundly important for development in all the areas of life. A child will learn about relationships, manners, self-esteem, worth and loyalty - all by watching and participating in family. Family life is where the child spends most of his or her learning time.Parents teach about values first by living those values particularly by setting boundaries,respecting others and by sharing family stories. Children learn much more from what they do than what they say.

The aim of the family is the total development of all. Development can be defined as the process of growing into maturity. Another way of putting it is:the process of enlarging people’s freedom and opportunities and improving their well-being at all levels. There are many factors that influence the development of the personality like the inherited temperamental qualities, parental practices and personality, quality of schools attended, relationships with peers, ordinal position in the family, the historical era in which late childhood and early adolescence are spent etc. All of this influence the development of the child; but the role the family plays is a very decisive one. It is in the family where we have our closest relationships and where we can express ourselves (for good or ill). Children need to learn in the family about disagreements and how to handle conflict. The most important support parents can give their children is to give them a secure base.
As a rule, all children grow up in a family and it is there that the most critical of all developments takes place. The environment in the family influences the child’s overall development more than any other- precisely because the most formative years of the child are when he/she is totally or almost totally dependent on the care givers.
I.One way of looking at the influence of the family on the development of the child is in terms of respect for boundaries. The father-mother unit will need to keep their boundary. Today, we come across many cases of boundary violations. For example, one of the parents becomes very close to a child and this parent despises,  scorns or ridicules his or her spouse. It can be due to one’s own need for affection which the partner does not satisfy or out of anger towards him / her. Or it could also be due to lack of certain qualities in the other. A child growing up witnessing such behavior will tend to violate ego-boundaries because that is what he or she has seen in the family. Every abuser / rapist is a boundary violator.

II.Let us take a look at the different aspects of human development: Development is a multifaceted reality: physical, emotional, intellectual, ego, moral and faith development.
Physical: It is the most basic of needs:  It is obvious that physical development does not take place if the family does not provide the needed nourishment. In most cases, parents do try to provide food as far as they are able.
Emotional: It is in the family that children learn the good use of emotions as well as the control of it. They learn a lot from the parents and siblings and the way emotions are expressed. If what they see in the family is acting out of emotions without any control, they tend to imitate the same. Capacity for delay of gratification is a sign of maturity. If this is not seen in the family, any amount of talking about it will not help. Another important aspect in modern families with one or two children is that parents try to provide all what the children ask for and hence they get immediate gratification. It is true that immediate satisfaction is possible today because things are available. Children growing up in this way will find it difficult to face any frustration and do not develop the ego strength that is necessary to persevere in times of difficulty. They will easily give up. Either over-gratification or deprivation leads to conflicts in the child.
Intellectual: Though most parents try to provide an education to their children, in many cases now a days, the absence of adequate personal attention and time spent with the children does not contribute to a healthy and balanced development. In such cases, especially school-going children tend to look for outside friendships as a substitute - which many times are not helpful for the over-all development of the child. Many able children tend to neglect their studies for they find no meaning in putting effort into it and the parents do not bother about their performance. On the other hand, there are also many cases where the parents want the children to over-achieve or choose a line of study which they themselves would have liked to take but were not able to – at the neglect of the child’s own interest.
Ego development:  In the normal process of growing up from babyhood, there is a stage called by Jane Loevinger, a specialist in Ego development, as impulsive stage. If favorable circumstances are not provided, development can get stuck at this stage. According to Loevinger, here the child asserts his growing sense of self' and views the world in ego-centric terms. At this stage the child is preoccupied with bodily impulses (age-appropriate), particularly sexual and aggressive ones. While this is a stage which is normal for toddlers, people can be in this stage for much longer, and in fact some people remain in this impulsive stage throughout their life. At this stage the ego continues to be focused on bodily feelings, basic impulses, and immediate needs. Not being particularly good at meeting these needs on their own, however, they are dependent and demanding. They are too immersed in the moment and in their own needs to think or care much about others or the consequences of their own behavior; instead, they experience the world in egocentric terms, in terms of how things are affecting them at the moment. If someone meets their needs, they are good; if someone frustrates their needs, they are bad.

Moral development: This aspect deals with the development of a sense of what is right and what is wrong, the development of a conscience. Again, the impact of lived witness of the parents and siblings is much weightier than what is told to them. If what they regularly witness in the family is abuse of any kind that would have more effect on the child than all the instructions given. Here also we encounter issues such as respecting and caring for others, having self-control etc. If the child is to have a good sense of what is right and wrong, it has to be witnessed, taught and learnt primarily in the family. For example, if the father tells the child to be honest while lying to the mother about what the child too has witnessed in the family, he / she will be more impressed by the lived life of the father than the expressed verbal command to be honest. The 7- year-old who was not chastised for aggressive behavior earlier or who had abusive or overly intrusive parents is likely to be aggressive with peers. It seems to me that in our culture, the permissiveness with which boys are brought up is one of the main reasons why some men have no qualms about abusing others –sexually and otherwise. The message given is that  everything is OK because you are a boy while for the same transgression, a girl would be punished and warned. A certain amount of discipline would be good for both boys and girls.
Religious/faith development: James Fowler defines “faith as an activity of trusting, committing, and relating to the world based on a set of assumptions of how one is related to others and the world”. And in our context, we would also include trusting, committing and relating to God. This is a gradual development in the child – especially depending on what the child has seen in the family. Family prayers, church-going etc. are meant to be expressions of it.  We are aware that these days, many families have given up all such practices and the young people find no meaning in these practices. Many times, the church is seen as an agent of control more than anything else.

III.Family influence on the children can be seen from the way parents affect their children. There are at least three different mechanisms.(Cf, Jerome Kagan)
(i) Direct interactions: This is the most obvious and involves the consequences of direct interactions with the child. For example, a mother praises a 3-year-old for eating properly; a father threatens the loss of a privilege because a child refuses to go to bed. Display of interest in a young child’s activities is correlated with greater levels of responsivity in the child. The 7-year-old who was not reprimanded for aggressive behavior earlier is likely to be aggressive with peers. A child who is abused tends to be an abuser.(Cf. Maccoby EE, Martin JA. Socialization in the context of the family)
According to attachment theorists - the relationships established between an infant and its caretakers during the first 2 years of life have a permanent effect on the child’s future.
(ii) Emotional identification: An emotional identification with either or both parents represents another way in which the family affects children. By age 4 to 5 years, children believe, unconsciously, that some of the attributes of their parents are part of their own qualities, even though this belief might have no objective basis. A girl whose mother is afraid of storms is tempted to assume that she, too, is afraid of storms; a girl with a relatively fearless mother will come to the opposite conclusion. A boy whose father is popular with friends and relatives, for example, will find it easier to conclude that he, too, has qualities that make him acceptable to others.
(iii) Narrating of family stories:
A third mechanism of family influence is related to identification, but is more symbolic. Some parents tell their children stories about relatives -uncles, aunts, grandparents, cousins—who were, or are, especially accomplished in some domain. Perhaps an uncle made an important discovery, accumulated wealth, performed a courageous act, was a talented athlete or writer, or a respected public official. The child is likely to feel pride on hearing these stories because of the implication that if he or she is biologically related to this important family member, the child, too, must also possess some admirable characteristics.
(iv)Yet another way of seeing the influence of the family on Human development is in terms of the stages of development.

Of the 8 stages of psychosocial development as described by Erikson, at least five are generally lived in the family that one is born into. Each of the stages has a developmental task. If the child does not encounter favorable environment especially in the earlier stages when the child is totally or almost totally dependent on care-givers and important tasks like learning to trust, to develop a healthy autonomy, to take initiative and feel good about it etc. may never be learnt and thus, development may be locked.

Though there are several other factors which also contribute to the development of the personality, the role played by the family is unique and crucial.

Saturday 15 February 2014

Analysis of the psychologically loaded concepts of Pope Francis

 

 

 

 

 Analysis of the psychologically loaded concepts of Pope Francis


by rev.dr.jose puthenveed 

Introduction
In this article I am making an attempt to explain the terms used by Pope Francis in two important speeches. The speech given by Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio (now Pope Francis) during the Cardinals' Pre-Conclave Meetings expressed his personal vision of the Church in the present time. The second one was done on 24th September 2013 in an interview given to  Eugenio  Scalfari,  La Repubblica's founder.
Go to the peripheries
The first of these points is on evangelization, and he says that "the Church must come out of herself and go to the peripheries" not only in a geographic sense, but also the existential, manifested in the mystery of sin, pain, injustice and ignorance, of doing without religion, of thought and of all misery.
The use of the term “peripheries” includes the psychologically marginalized people. About fifteen percent of the world population is disabled economically, politically, socially, emotionally and physically.
Self-referent Church
The second point is a criticism of the "self-referent" Church, which looks to herself in a sort of "theological narcissism," which separates her from the world and "keeps Jesus Christ within herself and does not allow Him to go out." When the Church does not come out of herself to evangelize, she becomes self-referent and then she gets sick. According to him the evils that over the course of time happen in ecclesial institutions have their root in a self-reference and a sort of theological narcissism. The self-referent Church keeps Jesus Christ within herself and does not let him come out. Let me now explain the term “theological narcissism” used by Pope Francis as I have understood.

Theological Narcissism
According to Greek mythology, Narcissus was a hunter from Thespia renowned for his beauty. His enemy, Nemesis, lured the arrogant Narcissus to a pool of water where he gazed at his own reflection and became utterly infatuated with the image in the pool, not realizing it was his own reflection. Enraptured with himself, Narcissus could not escape the beauty of his own reflection and eventually died.
The use of the term “theological narcissism” here should be understood psychologically.  Catholic Church in the analysis of the Pope is like Narcissus. She is infatuated with herself —obsessed with her own image. However, she is not satisfied merely to bask in her own importance, she wants everyone around her to be as enamored with her as she is with herself, and, what’s more, she wants God Himself to be so taken with her that He makes all His thoughts revolve around her as if she is the centre and ultimate end of all His plans. When the Church is self-referent without realizing it, she believes she has her own light. She ceases to be the mysterium lunae and gives way to that very great evil which is spiritual worldliness. His reference to the mysterium lunae, (the mystery of the moon) needs an explanation. The moon is the brightest object in the night sky, yet unlike the other stars in the sky, it has no light of its own. It only reflects the light of the nearest star, the Sun. Likewise. St. Ambrose said, “The Church shines not with its own light, but with that of Christ.” We would probably do well to remember that it is by the light of Christ reflected from the Church that we see through the darkness. The narcissistic Church can think that she is the Sun forgetting that she is only a Moon reflecting the light of Sun. Church should always thus remain ready to transmit the radiance of Christ, the Sun.
The self-centeredness is the heart of her pride and the foundation of her rebellion against God. Just as our arch nemesis deceived our first parents, so our Church, too, often fall prey to his schemes when she ignores God’s laws, negotiate her selfish desires with God, compromises His truth, rationalizes her sin, and then attempt to hide from Him by closing her eyes and pretending He doesn’t see her. The self-referent Church keeps Jesus Christ within herself and does not let him come out. The Pope told Scalfari Pope Francis said,“Proselytism is solemn nonsense, it makes no sense. We need to get to know each other, listen to each other and improve our knowledge of the world around us. Sometimes after a meeting I want to arrange another one because new ideas are born and I discover new needs. This is important: to get to know people, listen, expand the circle of ideas. The world is crisscrossed by roads that come closer together and move apart, but the important thing is that they lead towards the Good."

Personalized theological narcissism
Pope Francis’s usage of this psychological term has implications for us Catholic believers too.  Our narcissistic self-preoccupation constantly draws our eyes from the Creator to the creature, from God to self. As a result, we begin to develop our own personalized theology, making for ourself  a God in our own image, fashioning him to be everything we thought we ever wanted in a God — a God who loves whom we love and hates whom we hate, a God who is sovereign over all the good things in our lives but helpless and ignorant of all the bad things that happen to us, a God who serves us at our every beck and call. Such individualistic theology is, by nature, non-covenantal, non-familial, and non-ecclesiastical. It’s a theology centered on what makes sense to me, what seems fair to me, what makes me happy, and what makes me feel good about myself. Simply put, self-centered theology sees man as big and God as small. In the long interview with the atheist editor of the left-leaning La Repubblica newspaper, he said too many previous popes in the Church's long history were "narcissists" who let themselves be flattered by their "courtier" aides.
Conclusion
These are some of the thoughts and their interpretations. I see the shadows of the knowledge and integration of psychology falling on the life and theology of this modern prophet of the Catholic Church.  Will our theologian open their eyes? Will they take up this model of theologizing with the help of psychological science? I agree with the statement of Eugenio  Scalfari. “If the Church becomes like him and becomes what he wants it to be, it will be an epochal change” said his interviewer after his meeting on Tuesday 24, 2013 at Santa Marta, Vatican.

References:

2)      Pope Francis: 'The Church is the Community of God's People'  Vatican City, October 01, 2013 (Zenit.org) Junno Arocho Esteves 

1)      Havana, Cuba, March 26, 2013 (Zenit.org